Tiskové zprávy
WWF: Požadavky WTO na změny v podpoře exportu cukru z EU musí nastartovat reformu
WWF is calling on the European Union to reform its sugar regime, following a ruling by the World Trade Organization (WTO) that the EU has been illegally exporting too much subsidized sugar.
Following a complaint by Brazil, Thailand and Australia, the WTO confirmed a decision that the EU has been illegally exporting too much subsidized sugar, thereby undercutting more competitive producers overseas.
"The European Union will now have to face facts and reform its regime in a way that addresses the ruling and benefits poor countries and the environment," said Elizabeth Guttenstein, Head of WWF’s European Agriculture Programme.
“Unfair competition from EU sugar is not just a poverty issue," she added. "Sugar dumping depresses the world price and makes it difficult for sugar growers in developing countries to invest in better environmental practices like improved irrigation and preventing soil erosion and pollution. This ruling confirms that the EU has been acting unfairly for years and that it must end.”
Although the EU is discussing reform plans, WWF believes that these plans do not go far enough in addressing the WTO’s findings, which include calling for an immediate end to export dumping, a cut in EU production, and improved access for the world’s poorest countries to European markets.
The WTO also wants to see increased aid for developing countries to help them cope with the transition and invest in economically and environmentally sustainable sugar industries.
The EU’s legislative proposals on sugar reform are expected in early July 2005.
Earlier this month, another panel found that US cotton subsidies were also unlawful. WWF warned that if the EU and the US didn’t implement sugar and cotton rulings in good faith, this could jeopardize the entire round of WTO trade talks.
NOTES:
The WTO panel main findings are:
• The EU is dumping more than three times the level of subsidised sugar exports that it is allowed under WTO rules. (In the Uruguay Round, the EU committed to reduce its subsidised sugar exports to a maximum of 1.3 million tonnes per year. EC exports amounted to 4.1 million tonnes in the marketing year 2000/2001.)
• Around 2.1 million tonnes in 2004/5 according to EC figures of what the EU claims to be unsubsidised sugar (so-called non-quota or C sugar) are effectively cross-subsidised by the EU.
• The EU is contravening its WTO commitments by subsidising the re-export of an amount equivalent to imports of sugar from the African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) countries and India (1.6 million tonnes). These subsidised exports were not included in the EU’s reduction commitments and further exceed the EU’s permitted level of subsidised sugar exports.
• The EU sugar regime is worth approx Euro 1.7 billion per year.
• A study published earlier this week by the LMC International on behalf of the Least Developed Countries’ (LDCs) Sugar Group said that developing countries could create up to 145,000 jobs and attract more than $500m worth of investment in their sugar industries if the EU agreed pro-development reform.
Following a complaint by Brazil, Thailand and Australia, the WTO confirmed a decision that the EU has been illegally exporting too much subsidized sugar, thereby undercutting more competitive producers overseas.
"The European Union will now have to face facts and reform its regime in a way that addresses the ruling and benefits poor countries and the environment," said Elizabeth Guttenstein, Head of WWF’s European Agriculture Programme.
“Unfair competition from EU sugar is not just a poverty issue," she added. "Sugar dumping depresses the world price and makes it difficult for sugar growers in developing countries to invest in better environmental practices like improved irrigation and preventing soil erosion and pollution. This ruling confirms that the EU has been acting unfairly for years and that it must end.”
Although the EU is discussing reform plans, WWF believes that these plans do not go far enough in addressing the WTO’s findings, which include calling for an immediate end to export dumping, a cut in EU production, and improved access for the world’s poorest countries to European markets.
The WTO also wants to see increased aid for developing countries to help them cope with the transition and invest in economically and environmentally sustainable sugar industries.
The EU’s legislative proposals on sugar reform are expected in early July 2005.
Earlier this month, another panel found that US cotton subsidies were also unlawful. WWF warned that if the EU and the US didn’t implement sugar and cotton rulings in good faith, this could jeopardize the entire round of WTO trade talks.
NOTES:
The WTO panel main findings are:
• The EU is dumping more than three times the level of subsidised sugar exports that it is allowed under WTO rules. (In the Uruguay Round, the EU committed to reduce its subsidised sugar exports to a maximum of 1.3 million tonnes per year. EC exports amounted to 4.1 million tonnes in the marketing year 2000/2001.)
• Around 2.1 million tonnes in 2004/5 according to EC figures of what the EU claims to be unsubsidised sugar (so-called non-quota or C sugar) are effectively cross-subsidised by the EU.
• The EU is contravening its WTO commitments by subsidising the re-export of an amount equivalent to imports of sugar from the African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) countries and India (1.6 million tonnes). These subsidised exports were not included in the EU’s reduction commitments and further exceed the EU’s permitted level of subsidised sugar exports.
• The EU sugar regime is worth approx Euro 1.7 billion per year.
• A study published earlier this week by the LMC International on behalf of the Least Developed Countries’ (LDCs) Sugar Group said that developing countries could create up to 145,000 jobs and attract more than $500m worth of investment in their sugar industries if the EU agreed pro-development reform.
Tento článek patří do kategorie |
Online diskuse
Redakce Ekolistu vítá čtenářské názory, komentáře a postřehy. Tím, že zde publikujete svůj příspěvek, se ale zároveň zavazujete dodržovat pravidla diskuse. V případě porušení si redakce vyhrazuje právo smazat diskusní příspěvěk
